tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-38888900530098642742024-02-18T21:25:51.732-08:00Thoughts of a ChristianSin in a wicked man is like poison in a serpent; it is in its natural place. Thomas BrooksKen Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.comBlogger118125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-41549054670432178732010-09-19T21:48:00.000-07:002010-09-19T21:48:09.334-07:00The Puritian Sinners PrayerI don't remember where I found this, but it was included in the evangelism model I had put together several years ago. Good Stuff. <br />
<br />
Dear God, whom I hate with all my being precisely because you hate and threaten me with hell, I hate this punishment perhaps even more than I hate you. Or, maybe I should say that I love my comfort even more than I hate you. For that reason I am asking a favor of you. I want you to make me love you, whom I hate even when I ask this and even more because I have to ask this. I am being frank with you because I know it is no use to be otherwise. You know even better than I how much I hate you and that I love only myself. It is no use for me to pretend to be sincere. I most certainly do not love you and do not want to love you. I hate the thought of loving you but that is what I’m asking because I love myself. If you can answer this ‘prayer’ I guess the gift of gratitude will come with it and then I will be able to do what I would not think of doing now—thank you for making me love you whom I hate. Amen.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-34514256318644444602010-06-26T08:10:00.000-07:002010-06-26T08:10:18.155-07:00Ergun Caner, Liberty University and SBC TodayI have been following the Caner Saga since Dr. White first made mention of it. I have read, listened to and watched many hours of information from both sides on the issue. I have not commented up to this point, but now that Liberty University has released a formal statement, I will keep silent no longer.<br />
<br />
I think that Dr. Caner has disgraced the Name of Christ Jesus our Lord. He clearly has sinned against man and God and I pray that he is seeking repentance.<br />
<br />
I think that Liberty University has Moved in the right direction by Removing Dr. Caner as dean, however, it appears to me that when one makes " [...] factual statements that are self-contradictory [...]" and has " [...] discrepancies related to matters such as dates, names and places of residence [...]" on things as basic as where you were born, it seems that one is misrepresenting the truth for gain of some type (In my opinion, with no fact to back this up, it was for the credibility and respect it earned him, not to mention book sales, ect.).<br />
<br />
I think that SBC today has made the Stupidest statement I have ever heard regarding a public scandal when it stated, " [...] we praise God that Dr. Caner is exonerated [...]" as it seems clear that he was not exonerated, rather that he was deposed as Dean, and has been shown to be a liar. Yes, I am aware that Dr. Caner, when discussing being called a liar, said the following:<br />
<blockquote>Being called a “liar,” however, is a serious charge, especially when it is made by Christians. That would indicate that (1) the accusers can know the motives of the accused person’s heart, and (2) the accused person intentionally misled people.I have never intentionally misled anyone. I am sure I have made many mistakes in the pulpit in the past 20-plus years, and I am sure I will make some in the future. For those times where I misspoke, said it wrong, scrambled words, or was just outright confusing, I apologize and will strive to do better.</blockquote>The issue here is, We all know where we were born, Dr. Caner and SBC today. I was born in Glendale, CA. I was not born anywhere else, however Dr. Caner has on recording said he was born in two different countries! Hello! That is not misspeaking, that is not scrambled words or confusing, it is lying!<br />
<br />
I don't know anyone from sbc today and I am not a Southern Baptist, however, it seems to me that anyone who can make the statement they did, is blinded by some preconceived notion.<br />
<br />
Finally, I do not rejoice in this blasphemy of our Lord. I hope and pray that Dr. Caner and all involved in this will come to their collective senses and repent to God Almighty.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-6625281215398754782010-06-08T21:11:00.000-07:002010-06-08T21:11:16.620-07:00Discussion with A Mormon on Translations<div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>What prompted you to come onto Mormon.org today?</div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer">Me: </span>a question</div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer">Me: </span>is that ok</div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>yes of course!</div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer">Me: </span>it is about the 8th article of the church</div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>alright</div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer">Me: </span>has the church stated or defined what the proper translation of the bible is? </div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer">Me: </span>should one be using the Joseph Smith Translation? </div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>The church leves the Bible as is, but we have the Joseph Smith Translation to help clarify doctrine that was changed etc.</div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>We use the King James Version of the Bible.</div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer">Me: </span>so is the King James the Proper Translation of the Text? </div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>we know that that is not the proper translation completely, because through Revelation Joseph Smith has helped clarify some scriptures. That is why we say in the 8th Article of Faith, we believe the Bible to be the word of Goid as far as it is translated correctly</div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer">Me: </span>hmmm</div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer">Me: </span>so what is wrong with the King James? </div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>There is just things that have been translaed incorrectly or doctrines that have been changed through mans understanding.</div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer">Me: </span>do you have an example</div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer"></span></div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>an example is in John 1:1</div><div><span class="chatMessageCustomer">Me: </span>ok</div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>In the beginning was the <i>gospel preached through the Son. And the gospel was the word, and the word was with the Son, and the Son was with God, and the Son was of God</i></div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span><span style="color: black;">In the Bible it says :<span class="footscript"><span class="smallcaps"><span style="background-color: #ffffcc;">In</span></span></span> the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. </span></div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>The first was a translation from Revelation through Joseph Smith.</div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>This clarifys it and helps us to understand that the word means the Gospel of Jesus Christ is the Word of God—He created all things and was made flesh—John baptizes Jesus and testifies he is the Lamb of God—John, Andrew, Simon, Philip, and Nathanael believe in Christ and follow him. Christ.</div><div><span class="chatMessageAgent">Chelsea: </span>alot of people think that that verse means that God and Jesus Christ are the same person. We know that they are two seperate beings but united in purpose</div><div> </div><div>I have to admit, that in all my discussions with Mormons, this is the first time that I have heard this, and while I am not 'surprised' I am shocked at the lengths the Joseph Smith and the Mormon Church go to re-translate the clear texts of scripture. </div><div><br />
</div><div>However, this is where things get more interesting. Go to - http://scriptures.lds.org/en/john/1 and notice the header which reads: <i> <b>Christ is the Word of God</b>—He created all things and was made flesh—John baptizes Jesus and testifies he is the Lamb of God—John, Andrew, Simon, Philip, and Nathanael believe in Christ and follow him. </i></div><div><br />
</div><div>Does it seem odd that they wouldn't clear up the misconception that Jesus is God right here? I mean why even publish something that is so bankrupt and clearly wrong, would be a good question for our Mormon friends. </div><div><br />
</div><div>The JST (Joseph Smith Translation) reads as follows:</div><div><br />
</div><div>1 In the beginning was the gospel preached through the Son. And the gospel was the word, and the word was with the Son, and the Son was with God, and the Son was of God. <br />
2 The same was in the beginning with God. <br />
3 All things were made by him; and without him was not anything made which was made. <br />
4 In him was the gospel, and the gospel was the life, and the life was the light of men; <br />
5 And the light shineth in the world, and the world perceiveth it not. </div><div>....</div><div>14 And the same word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the Only Begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth. </div><div><br />
</div><div>It seems that there is a bit of a hiccup here because it seems that Ol' Joe forgot to re-translate verse 14, because this would mean that the Gospel was made flesh... and then dwelt among us as who?? ... Jesus ... Maybe? If not then who...? </div><div><br />
</div><div></div><div></div><div>Despite Ol' Joe's best effort it seems that he missed something, or perhaps the church will get a word about the JST here. </div>Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-81533341909603352582010-06-06T20:11:00.000-07:002010-06-06T20:11:27.010-07:00The Hypostatic Union - An Audio BlogThe Hypostatic Union is a deeply important and yet difficult doctrine to understand, in the following Audio Blog I attempt to discuss the issues surrounding it, esp. as it relates to John 17:3.<br />
<br />
<embed align="middle" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="poid=2427220&d=http://www.sermon.net/&autostart=false" height="65" name="mpp" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" src="http://sermon.net/swf/ma.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="290" wmode="transparent"></embed>Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-80431417920589597462010-02-28T17:10:00.000-08:002010-02-28T17:19:58.960-08:00Believers Reason Apologetics Class pt 1Ah back on the blog again. I have to be honest, working a sales job is very mentally draining and doesn't leave me much energy to blog, however, I am hoping that this gets me back on track. At the church I have started an apologetics class based on The Believers Reason, that will featured Sundays on this blog until its completion ten weeks from now. It is my prayer that over these next weeks God would work in your heart to give you a desire to defend the truth and the Church (universal). As Part of our homework for this week, please download and listen to one sermon/show, from the two groups and compare them, looking for Christ-Centeredness, The Gospel, Life tips, Pop Psychology, Proper use and context in bible verses, the style and Goal of preaching, What does the pastor want you to walk away with, ect. <br />
<br />
Here is the Class Audio, go to menu to download it.<br />
<br />
<br />
<embed align="middle" allowscriptaccess="always" flashvars="poid=2355684&d=http://www.sermon.net/&autostart=false" height="65" name="mpp" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" quality="high" src="http://sermon.net/swf/ma.swf" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="290" wmode="transparent"></embed><br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://gccwired.com/images/headerGCClogo.gif" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://gccwired.com/images/headerGCClogo.gif" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.blogger.com/goog_1267400960170"> </a><br />
<a href="http://media.saddlebackfamily.com/8a4df74b-5301-4b22-bc6a-1f94b1ec80dc.aspx?z=gMlX+UvJhxjg1Fv6mIQdahcVWWz06H4Q/+85ydW1pjV486AyjAm+Qo4YGnDxJmzoXnwHMuUh4QhUeWN/QQjtc4UiMQPE1sWSQCxI9vNySUe0iW2/OdoYiQ==" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" src="http://media.saddlebackfamily.com/8a4df74b-5301-4b22-bc6a-1f94b1ec80dc.aspx?z=gMlX+UvJhxjg1Fv6mIQdahcVWWz06H4Q/+85ydW1pjV486AyjAm+Qo4YGnDxJmzoXnwHMuUh4QhUeWN/QQjtc4UiMQPE1sWSQCxI9vNySUe0iW2/OdoYiQ==" /></a><a href="http://gccwired.com/streampagenew.asp?pageID=174"> Get Sermons From Granger</a><br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://saddleback.com/MediaCenter/Services/Default.aspx">Get Sermons From Saddleback</a></div><div style="text-align: right;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: right;"><br />
</div><div style="text-align: right;"><a href="http://www.blogger.com/goog_1267403583875"><br />
</a></div><div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.lifechurch.tv/message-archive">Get Sermons from Life Church</a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://ext.lifechurch.tv/img/landing/logo.png" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="36" src="http://ext.lifechurch.tv/img/landing/logo.png" width="320" /></a></div><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
And For Quality, More Biblical Sermons and Sermon Reviews<br />
<br />
<div style="color: black;"><b><br />
</b></div><div style="color: lime; text-align: left;"><b><span style="color: black;">PHOENIX REFORMED BAPTIST CHURCH</span></b> <a href="http://www.prbc.org/Sermons.htm"><span style="color: black;">Get Sermons from PRBC</span></a></div><div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://fm.thevillagechurch.net/images/common/hdrTVCLogo-fm.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="73" src="http://fm.thevillagechurch.net/images/common/hdrTVCLogo-fm.jpg" width="320" /></a></div><div style="color: lime; text-align: left;"></div><div style="color: lime; text-align: left;"><a href="http://fm.thevillagechurch.net/sermons"><span style="color: black;">Get Sermons from The Village Church</span></a></div><div style="color: lime; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><div style="color: lime; text-align: left;"><br />
</div><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.piratechristianradio.com/images/pcrwidget.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="clear: left; float: left; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"><img border="0" height="320" src="http://www.piratechristianradio.com/images/pcrwidget.jpg" width="109" /></a></div>Check Out <a href="http://www.fightingforthefaith.com/">Fighting for the Faith</a>, A program I listen to frequently, for quality sermon reviews and Christian discernment. Yes, I know its by a Lutheran, but hey, they aren't all bad.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-26014720671334274402010-01-11T22:13:00.000-08:002010-01-11T22:13:20.308-08:00The Consumer Driven Church pt. 2<div class="separator" style="clear: both; text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.churchrequel.com/.a/6a00d83455838a69e20120a5f304e2970c-pi" imageanchor="1" style="clear: right; float: right; margin-bottom: 1em; margin-left: 1em;"><img border="0" height="211" src="http://www.churchrequel.com/.a/6a00d83455838a69e20120a5f304e2970c-pi" width="320" /></a><a href="http://www.churchrequel.com/.a/6a00d83455838a69e20120a5f304e2970c-pi" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;"></a> <br />
</div>The more I think about the topic of Consumerism in the church the more comes to mind. Specifically things that are done by mega-churches such as Granger Community Church. Now, I am not condemning large churches in general, but rather the methods that are employed at times, by them. Consider this sign from 'Church Requel.' Notice how the Goal is the drawing of people, not Jesus. Moreover, it is a selfish (sinful) motive that one should come to the church, because YOU want life change. What is worse is the concept being forwarded, is that of <i>life change</i>, and it isn't the Christian Message or even close to it. Yes, Christianity changes lives, but it is because God changes people's hearts, wills and desires, and because we become justified and begin being sanctified. The Christian message is repentance and the forgiveness of sins in Jesus name. The consumerism of our churches has changed that offensive message of the cross to make it more palatable for the unregenerate sinner who has come into the church for 'life change.'<br />
<br />
In reality, it seems that the promise of life change is also a simple lie. The main reason I make that comment is that Requel Church, has no power to change lives in the Christian sense, that ability belongs to God alone. Father more it seems to me that the idea of life change is the end goal, and this picture is foreign to biblical authors. In our consumerist desires look to the church/Jesus to increase our comforts, supply desires, and increase prosperity, all while making our quality of life better. Yet consider Paul's statements that he makes without disdain:<br />
<blockquote>To my shame, I must say, we were too weak for that! But whatever anyone else dares to boast of--I am speaking as a fool--I also dare to boast of that. Are they Hebrews? So am I. Are they Israelites? So am I. Are they offspring of Abraham? So am I. Are they servants of Christ? I am a better one--I am talking like a madman--with far greater labors, far more imprisonments, with countless beatings, and often near death. Five times I received at the hands of the Jews the forty lashes less one. Three times I was beaten with rods. Once I was stoned. Three times I was shipwrecked; a night and a day I was adrift at sea; on frequent journeys, in danger from rivers, danger from robbers, danger from my own people, danger from Gentiles, danger in the city, danger in the wilderness, danger at sea, danger from false brothers; in toil and hardship, through many a sleepless night, in hunger and thirst, often without food, in cold and exposure. And, apart from other things, there is the daily pressure on me of my anxiety for all the churches. Who is weak, and I am not weak? Who is made to fall, and I am not indignant? If I must boast, I will boast of the things that show my weakness. (2 Corinthians 11:21-30 ESV) <br />
</blockquote>Yet in all of this, the modern ideal of comfort is missing. Where is the concept of Life Improvement? I mean, Paul's life was changed, from that of a rich young lawyer, well respected by his community to what we see him describe above. That isn't what I would call improvement, save for his salvation a sanctification in Christ Jesus the Lord. The whole point of this Life Improvement gospel, is an appeal to the consumerist driven American culture. <br />
<br />
I think that the recent Facebook postings of womens bra colors are a picture of this same consumerism. How? Walk through any mall, and you will see Large photographs of women in their bra's, designed to excite and spawn desire, the same can be said for TV, Billboards, some Magazines, ect... all this consumerism has lead to a hardening of our minds in terms of sexuality, whereby we need more to be excited, but also we fail to even realize that behavior such as this is even sexual. This is from the root of consumerism that screams "BUY BUY BUY" and as the saying goes, "Sex Sells."<br />
<br />
Let us work to recapture our innocence of heart and mind. Let us Strive to realize that the consumerism in our lives and mortify it. If not, We will usher in our children to the Consumer Driven Church.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-14290353087835944482009-12-17T07:30:00.000-08:002009-12-17T07:39:21.383-08:00How to critique, from Dr. James WhiteNot often do I completely rip off someone else's work for the sake of this Blog. However, today is going to be an exception. I have to say that Dr. White is an incredibly smart yet humble man and that when he critiques someone we should take notice not only of what he says, but how he says it. I want to direct you, reader, to his <a href="http://www.aomin.org/aoblog/index.php?itemid=3679">blog</a> for a critique of William Lane Craig's view of middle knowledge. <br />
<br />
<i>Welcome back.</i><br />
<br />
I want to point out several things. First is the biblical emphasis that the post has, the repeated statement of being grieved at the sub-biblical nature of Middle Knowledge (Molinism). I think that this speaks to not only how but why we critique someone else who claims to be within the Christian faith. First, is the relation of their teaching to biblical revelation, in other words, how does what this person says relate to Scripture (our guide). Second, the critique focus upon the effect of the theology on those who embrace it. In this case, Dr. White is saying the theology in question points people away from scripture. Finally, he responds with his desire for repentance toward God for this sub-biblical theology/philosophy. <br />
<br />
The Gospel centered focus of this gives all of us something to look toward as an example of how we should critique those whom we disagree. In a someone practical way I believe that we can rightly apply Philippians 4:9 to Dr. James White.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-79396550546956965012009-12-16T08:44:00.000-08:002009-12-16T08:44:03.939-08:00A Grace Gem by J. R, MillerIf you don't get <a href="http://www.gracegems.org/">Grace Gems</a>, I highly suggest that you do. They are both challenging and encouraging at the same time, and they give a picture of what Christians have thought and said in the past. They often go by author, and I have to say that J.R. Miller is quickly become someone I deeply respect. Here is today's devotion for your consideration.<br />
<br />
(J. R. Miller, "The Beauty of Quietness" 1903)<br />
<br />
"They will be like dew sent by the Lord." Micah 5:7<br />
<br />
The lives of godly people are sometimes compared to the dew. One point of likeness, is the quiet way in which the dew performs its ministry. It falls silently and imperceptibly. It makes no noise. No one hears it dropping. It chooses its time in the night when men are sleeping, when none can see its beautiful work. It covers the leaves with clusters of pearls. It steals into the bosoms of the flowers, and leaves new cupfuls of sweetness there. It pours itself down among the roots of the grasses and tender herbs and plants. It loses itself altogether, and yet it is not lost. For in the morning there is fresh life everywhere, and new beauty. The fields are greener, the gardens are more fragrant, and all nature is clothed in fresh luxuriance!<br />
<br />
Is there not in this simile, a suggestion as to the way we should seek to do good in this world? Should we not wish to have our influence felt--while no one thinks of us; rather than that we should be seen and heard and praised? Should we not be willing to lose ourselves in the service of self-forgetful love, as the dew loses itself in the bosom of the rose--caring only that other lives shall be sweeter, happier, and holier--and not that honor shall come to us? We are too anxious, some of us, that our names shall be written in large letters on the things we do, even on what we do for our Master; and are not willing to sink ourselves out of sight--and let Him alone have the praise.<br />
<br />
Our Lord's teaching on the subject is very plain. He says: "Be careful not to do your 'acts of righteousness' before men, to be seen by them. If you do, you will have no reward from your Father in heaven. So when you give to the needy, do not announce it with trumpets, as the hypocrites do in the synagogues and on the streets, to be honored by men. I tell you the truth, they have received their reward in full." That is, they have that which they seek--the applause of men.<br />
<br />
"But when you give to the needy, do not let your left hand know what your right hand is doing, so that your giving may be in secret. Then your Father, who sees what is done in secret, will reward you." The meaning would seem to be, that we are not to wish people to know of our good deeds, our charities, our self-denials; that we should not seek publicity, when we give money or do good works; indeed, that we are not even to tell ourselves what we have done; that we are not to think about our own good deeds so as to become conscious of them; not to put them down in our diaries and go about complimenting ourselves, throwing bouquets at ourselves, and whispering: "How good I am! What fine things I have done!"<br />
<br />
This is an insightful test of our lives. Are we willing to be as the dew--to steal abroad in the darkness, carrying blessings to men's doors, blessings that shall enrich the lives of others and do them good--and then steal away again before those we have helped or blessed awaken, to know what hand it was that brought the gift? Are we willing to work for others . . .<br />
without gratitude,<br />
without recognition,<br />
without human praise,<br />
without requital?<br />
<br />
Are we content to have our lives poured out like the dew--to bless the world and make it more fruitful--and yet remain hidden away ourselves? Is it enough for us to see the fruits of our toil and sacrifice--in others' spiritual growth, and deeper happiness; yet never hear our names spoken in praise or honor--perhaps even hearing others praised for things we have done?<br />
<br />
If you go about doing good in simple ways, in gentle kindnesses, not thinking of reward, not dreaming of praise, not hoping for any return--you are enshrining your name where it will have immortal honor! Our lesson teaches us that this is the way we are to live--if we are followers of Christ!Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-75890690905447139682009-12-15T21:41:00.000-08:002009-12-15T21:42:19.487-08:00Husband and Wives as Christ and the ChurchI was doing dishes this evening and I was simply musing on something, and I figured I would put it up on here for consideration. I would especially ask for a few wives ( maybe even my own) to comment. <br />
<br />
In Ephesians 5, Paul likens the Husband and Wife to Christ and the church, and says that wives are to submit to their husband's as they submit to The Lord. Now in general if Jesus were to ask you to do something, and you were to fail to do it (ie, the 3 and prayer on the Mt. of Olives) it would be sin. My thought was, does this follow with the husband wife relationship or is Paul simply saying that this is the seriousness with with you are submit to your husband. <br />
<br />
So ladies, If you husband asks you to clean the house, make dinner, have sex, whatever, is it in your mind that you are to submit to him as to Jesus. Do you think you are to submit to the request as if Jesus was asking? <br />
<br />
As a note, I have no conclusion, or statement either way, I am not looking for my wife to do something, but I am posing a serious theological question.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com10tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-21825765289894484902009-12-12T15:21:00.001-08:002009-12-12T15:21:58.187-08:00A discussion of Heb 1:1-2, with an OutlawpreacherOn twitter, I have been having a discussion with a guy by the name of pastornar abbout Hebrews 1:1-2, and it's relation to direct revelation from God to us(you). Keep in mind that twitter limits you to 160 characters, several of which go toward the persons name, ect... <br />
<br />
"I believe the Scriptures say that in these last days he has spoken to us in/thru his Son.... If the Head of the Body cannot directly communicate with the Body we have a weak, sick, handicapped Body."<br />
<br />
Now he is referencing as you can tell, Hebrews 1:1-2. <br />
<br />
Here is what that text says, (ESV) Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world. <br />
<br />
Simple questions here:<br />
What is then tense of Spoken, I would say past. <br />
Did God speak to your fathers by the prophets? Unless you are Jewish, No.<br />
Did the author of this text mean for it to imply that Christ is actively speaking to the people via special revelation? I Would say no, and here is why --<br />
<br />
According to Vincent's Word Studies, the literal greek rendering of the phrase 'in these last days' is "at the last of these days." Notable Commentator John Gill says about this - <blockquote>[...] the Alexandrian copy, the Complutensian edition, and several other copies, read, "in the last of these days": perfectly agreeable to the phrase באחרית הימים, used in Gen_49:1 to which the apostle refers, and in which places the days of the Messiah are intended; and it is a rule with the Jews, that wherever the phrase, "the last days", is mentioned, the days of the Messiah are designed: and they are to be understood not of the last days of the natural world, but of, the Jewish world and state;[...]</blockquote><br />
Clearly the time period of Christ was the 'last days' for the Jewish nation and for temple based Judaism with the destruction of the temple in 70 AD. <br />
The question that should follow in our minds then is, Does this passage speak of direct personal special revelation from Christ to all individual Christians, <i>or</i> is it speaking about God's revelation of the Gospel through his son? Given the direct context I would submit that the later interpretation is more accurate to what the author had in mind when writing this text.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-22853061646791215082009-12-05T10:44:00.000-08:002009-12-05T10:44:53.565-08:00Biblical Modesty v. Legalist Dress Codes<p>I think that the topic of biblical modesty for women is one that is both of prime importance and practical significance. To that end, I would like to submit a view to be considered, namely that a legalistic dress code is equally sinful when compared to immodest dress.</p><blockquote>"Being more conservative than scripture is no more praiseworthy than being more liberal than scripture." - Doug Eaton </blockquote><p>The problem of the legalistic dress code is that it does not allow two important things. First, it denies woman's ability to live the gospel out in their dress, and instead it forces women back under the law. Second, it defines what is 'modest' generally in terms of Historical American dress, and thus, defines the bible's concept by our culture. Let me give an example. The blog <a href="http://modestwomen.blogspot.com/">Modesty</a> tells us that " Modest dress is dressing in dresses or skirts [...]" it continues to say that if a women isn't covered from neck to ankle, with full sleeves that "she is dressing like a harlot." I would love to hear this women try to give a biblical guideline, for someone of a non-american culture. I also <i>loved</i> the womans statement after showing some photo's that when asked about these womens dress she states, "If he is a <u>real godly man</u> he will tell you that these women look like harlots." The arrogance that is present is staggering.</p><p><b>Looking at the Bible:</b></p><p>The bible speaks of modesty at several points, most clearly, 1 Tim 2:8-10. It is also noteworthy, that women in Proverbs 31 is never said or give a specific mode of dress other then she is clothed with fine linen and purple (ESV). </p><p>I desire then that in every place the men should pray, lifting holy hands without anger or quarreling; likewise also that women should adorn themselves in respectable apparel, with modesty and self-control, not with braided hair and gold or pearls or costly attire, but with what is proper for women who profess godliness--with good works. (1 Timothy 2:8-10 ESV). <br />
<br />
The questions to be answered are, what is respectable apparel, and what is costly attire? I don't think that these questions have a specific answer, and by that I mean that the answer is different for different cultures. In some cultures, that may mean neck to ankle, in others it may mean something less. I can only imagine that standard being applied to places where weather would make that impossible, or where it is still only hide that is used for coverings. My point is this, we must allow the gospel to define modesty for us, not a set of rules. We need to function from grace and in a manner that is set at glorifying God, not obeying the law.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com6tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-64876815960534074342009-11-14T19:54:00.000-08:002009-11-14T23:18:55.822-08:00Eugene Peterson, Author of The Message BibleI am well aware that people know my thoughts on <span style="font-style:italic;">The Message Bible</span> (See image for reference)<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjSTylPMPzcX8gAeXxerBoppDI8Nft3iB74gCuy5GL3ceZWTLXHddElJbwWfcNcO-TQkYoDmwYVbVCM7UR_hLKmEAhDflbpoR1Pd3f461lDkj2O99vxfP9uGnjxUqhZC4cA1a6kEKQBrI/s1600-h/bible_transchrt_js.jpg"><img style="float:center; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 400px; height: 75px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhjSTylPMPzcX8gAeXxerBoppDI8Nft3iB74gCuy5GL3ceZWTLXHddElJbwWfcNcO-TQkYoDmwYVbVCM7UR_hLKmEAhDflbpoR1Pd3f461lDkj2O99vxfP9uGnjxUqhZC4cA1a6kEKQBrI/s400/bible_transchrt_js.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5404225160893675906" /></a> but I have to say that the author of said work, Eugene Peterson, has written something that I think is Perfectly Brilliant. So without delay here are Eugene Peterson's comments on the Church and Pastors... <br /><p><blockquote>For a long time, I have been convinced that I could take a person with a high school education, give him or her a six-month trade school training, and provide a pastor who would be satisfactory to any discriminating American congregation. The curriculum would consist of four courses.<br /><br /> Course I: Creative Plagiarism. I would put you in touch with a wide range of excellent and inspirational talks, show you how to alter them just enough to obscure their origins, and get you a reputation for wit and wisdom.<br /><br /> Course II: Voice Control for Prayer and Counseling. We would develop your own distinct style of Holy Joe intonation, acquiring the skill in resonance and modulation that conveys and unmistakable aura of sanctity.<br /><br /> Course III: Efficient Office Management. There is nothing that parishioners admire more in their pastors than the capacity to run a tight ship administratively. If we return all phone calls within twenty-four hours, answer all the letters within a week, distributing enough carbons to key people so that they know we are on top of things, and have just the right amount of clutter on our desk—not too much, or we appear inefficient, not too little or we appear underemployed—we quickly get the reputation for efficiency that is far more important than anything that we actually do.<br /><br /> Course IV: Image Projection. Here we would master the half-dozen well-known and easily implemented devices that that create the impression that we are terrifically busy and widely sought after for counsel by influential people in the community. A one-week refresher course each year would introduce new phrases that would convince our parishioners that we are bold innovators on the cutting edge of the megatrends and at the same time solidly rooted in all the traditional values of our sainted ancestors.<br /><br /> (I have been laughing for several years over this trade school training with which I plan to make my fortune. Recently, though, the joke has backfired on me. I keep seeing advertisements for institutes and workshops all over the country that invite pastors to sign up for this exact curriculum. The advertised course offerings are not quite as honestly labeled as mine, but the content appears to be identical—a curriculum that trains pastors to satisfy the current consumer tastes in religion. I’m not laughing anymore.)</blockquote> </p><br /><br />from Working the Angles: The Shape of Pastoral Integrity (pp. 7-8), As quoted by Matt Chandler.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-73026329960552928872009-11-01T20:54:00.000-08:002009-11-06T16:49:38.089-08:00Event Review : Hellhouse<p> <span style="font-weight:bold;">Backstory</span>: The Church, Andy specifically, received an invite from a semi-local church who for Halloween was putting on a 'hellhouse.' When I first heard about the event, and saw the postcard/flier I was less the enthusiastic to be sure. I find no pleasure in putting ones self into frighting situations for entertainment. However, when I read the accompanying letter with tickets, I was attracted. </p> <p> The Letter boasted that 1 in 4 people going through this pray a prayer of salvation, and 25% of those are for the first time! (notice that out of 16 people, 4 "make a decision" and 3 of those have done it before...). It seemed that I would be going to the Hellhouse after all, to see if it was indeed an effective evangelistic tool, what the Gospel presentation was, ect... (all those minor theological issues) I felt it to be wise to take along someone, and go figure there were two tickets. </p><br /><p> <span style="font-weight:bold;">Into The Hellhouse</span>: I will note that I was a bit distracted, it was a cold (mid 40's) evening and we arrived at the hellhouse at about midnight Halloween night (so technically this morning). As a personal note, an event center is not a strictly understood indoor venue per se, and a jacket would have been a wise addition to the lone t-shirt I was wearing. There was a line when we arrived, which is to be expected, however, it wasn't a long one. We waited just about 30 minutes to enter. Walking through the double doors covered with what seemed to be black plastic sheets of some sort, it was difficult to see, and we were guided as a small herd to the center of the room, it was then that I first noticed our tour guides, they were 'demons' In the center of the room was a young lady (teen) in a casket. The main tour guide (again, demon) began telling us how we would all end up like this some day, and that it was his goal to make it sooner rather then later. </p> <p> The next room was a bathroom, with a teen boy sitting on the toilet. The tour guide began to explain how much he enjoyed suicide. A drama was played out where a demon lead the young man essentially from life problems ( girlfriend issues, Sports teams, absent father) to the point of suicide. The end was predictable, with the young man shooting himself, and the demon rejoicing. (no blood/guts). The before entering the next room the demons (about 4 or 5 that traveled with the group, began telling us about their next scheme, Sex. As we entered the next room, I was shocked; the setup was that we would be seeing a boyfriend and girlfriend after prom, with her parents away, and they were in love (dating all of three weeks). In a bed, was a shirtless young man, and a clothed young lady (presumably of High School age) making out, hardcore. The tour guide calls for the execution of the pearl of her virginity. This is followed by her hearing the tour guide and the boy getting down to business so to speak. She under the blanket she removes her shirt, and the couple have simulated sex. The demons dance in pleasure sing, "that's the way I like it, uh-huh, uh-huh." The boy leaves, and the girl is left alone, weeping. </p> <p> The next room was an accident scene, where 3 had died, and one young man, had lived. He falls out of his car, with a beer bottle, weeping. Paramedics arrive, and explain that the other people are dead. The scene ends with the demons rejoicing. We are then ushered it to a party scene. A girl was encouraged to remove some clothing, and drink. She passed out, and some boys said they would have their way with her. However, the demons spoke not of the rape, but of the drinking. </p> <p> The next room, from my understanding is a staple at all hellhouses and that is the abortion room. I have to say that it was not overly realistic, but there was gore. Mostly a screaming girl and an uncaring doctor... The demons rejoiced at the death of infants. The room that followed, was perhaps the most striking of the entire experience, and it was the newly emptied womb, the mother, and four manifestations of the dead child, as a young child, a teen, a bride and as an old women. This was combine with a weeping mother and the "angel of the future." </p> <p> The next room was, hell. It was stereotypical, demons torturing people for pleasure, Satan as the king, he even had a throne. The general message was that it was Satan's goal to get you there. We were then ushered into a room that had 5 floor to ceiling coffins. We were put into them and the were locked on both sides. After a short time the opposite door opened to a bright, all white heaven, complete with Jesus and Angels. Jesus had no throne but stood and addressed us. The final place we were taken into was the 'decision' room. One of the youth pastors addressed as and basically made an alter call. </p><br /><p> <span style="font-weight:bold;">The Christian Perspective</span> I think that there are several things that were extremely problematic about this Hellhouse. First, It presented an essentially dualistic view of God and Satan. Demons seemingly had the power to kill man, and God was absent. Second, The Gospel was absent. At no point was there a clear presentation of the forgiveness of sin. We were told that if your name is found in the book of life you will not parish, however, this is far from a clear gospel presentation. Moreover, the concept of repentance was also absent. There was plenty of law preaching, what sin was, was clear, but the concept of repentance was just not spoken about. However, it was only briefly mentioned of such sins as lying, cheating, stealing, and in some respects i don't think that this brief mentioning of the law really hit people. That said, it seems that if you haven't have premarital sex, or killed someone with a car, raped someone, gotten hammered, had an abortion, the law missed you. These are problems, but the width of condemnation wasn't wide enough. </p> <p> The next issue is the couple in bed. Now, I am not sure if they were a married couple, which is my hope. If not, the problem is huge, and clear. Also, The Gospel in the decision room was so weak and anemic that it hardly recognizable. The message of do you know where you are going when you die, is not the Gospel. I wonder what the 1/16 first time responders really responded to. Was it the Fear of God's Wrath? I don't think so. Was it brokenness over their sin? I don't think the presentation definitionally warranted the belief that we have sinned against a holy and righteous God. I struggle with the presentation of the powerful Satan, and the yearning God. </p> <br /><p> <span style="font-weight:bold;">Concluding Thoughts</span>: The Hellhouse was an interesting experience. Would I say it is an effective evangelism tool? Maybe. There were significant issues with this one, that made it problematic, however, I think that it could be done in such a way as to present truly biblical views. That said, I don't think that it takes the place of preaching the forgiveness of Sin in Jesus' name. I struggle with the tactic in general. I don't think it is by definition sinful. I would be interested to see the results v/ cost, as well as a defense of charging people to enter. Overally, I rate the event a 2 out of 10 for evangelistic value, Gospel Centered, and Biblical Accuracy.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-80808534102157706132009-10-14T23:00:00.000-07:002009-10-14T23:01:51.852-07:0040 Days of Love Sermons - Love Tells the TruthHere is a Sermon that I preached last Week. It is in my opinion the finest sermon I have EVER preached, and the recorder died half way through.... <br /><br /><img style="visibility:hidden;width:0px;height:0px;" border=0 width=0 height=0 src="http://counters.gigya.com/wildfire/IMP/CXNID=2000002.11NXC/bT*xJmx*PTEyNTU1ODYyNTYzMjAmcHQ9MTI1NTU4NjI2Nzk*MiZwPTEzNjgyMSZkPSZnPTEmb2Y9MA==.gif" /><embed src="http://sermon.net/swf/ma.swf" quality="high" width="290" height="65" name="mpp" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="always" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="poid=2269022&d=http://www.sermon.net/" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></embed><br /><br />Enjoy!Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-54544493166955906032009-10-14T22:25:00.000-07:002009-10-14T22:28:28.483-07:00Sermon - 40 Days of Love - Love ForgivesSo tonight I preached a sermon on from the church's 40 days of love series, on Love Forgives. <br /><p> </p><br /><embed src="http://sermon.net/swf/ma.swf" quality="high" width="290" height="65" name="mpp" align="middle" allowScriptAccess="always" wmode="transparent" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" flashvars="poid=2269019&d=http://www.sermon.net/" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer"></embed><br /><br />Enjoy!Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-4937119286933283812009-09-14T19:36:00.000-07:002009-09-14T19:49:21.197-07:00Special Guest Blog - Why The Bible Is NecessaryI have asked a friend, who is far smarter and more of a scholar then I to write an entry on something that he felt would be valuable for the readership. So here is his Entry.
<br />
<br /><title></title><meta name="GENERATOR" content="OpenOffice.org 3.1 (Win32)"><style type="text/css"> <!-- @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } A:link { color: #0000ff } --> </style> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Why The Bible Is Necessary For Apologetics: A Brief Reflection On 1 Peter 3.15</b></span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Introduction</b></span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">The study of defending the Christian faith has recently become extremely popular. Bookstores are filled with manuals on how Christians can defend their faith. Usually the books present “facts” from secular writings. The Big Bang Theory, Ancient Greek philosophy, Near Death Experiences, selections from secular Roman historians and even liberal theology are used to try and show unbelievers that Christianity is reasonable. Christians are encouraged to look at these “facts” with unbelievers in a “neutral” way as though God does not exist or the Bible is not His Word. I find this odd.</span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">When we are looking for help in our marriages, or need to tell someone how to be saved, or we are trying to find a word of comfort to share with a hurting friend we typically go to the Bible. If we do not go to the Bible for these things, we at least should do so! I find it odd, then, that we should go anywhere other than the Bible when we are called upon to defend our faith. </span></span> </p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">God knows everything. Thankfully, God has revealed some of His knowledge to us. We have a basis for our knowledge because of revelation. It is for this reason we should turn to the treasures of wisdom (the wisdom of God) we have in the Bible when we need help with…well…anything! Defending the faith is not an exception.</span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Motive</b></span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>The Bible is needed for motivation to defend the faith.</b></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> If someone asks, “Why should we even defend the Christian faith?” the only way we are able to answer at all is if we turn to the Bible. “I</span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">n your hearts honor Christ the Lord as holy, always being prepared to make a defense to anyone who asks you for a reason for the hope that is in you; yet do it with gentleness and respect…” 1 Peter 3.15 (ESV) This verse of the Bible commands Christians to always be ready to make a defense. This is one verse that gives us our motivation for defending the faith. There are many others. If we approach an unbeliever from a point of view where God does not exist or the Bible is not His Word then there is no need to defend our faith. There is no honest way to get on “common ground” with an unbeliever and still have a reason or motivation to defend our faith. We not only </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>have</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> to be committed to the Bible, we </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>should</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> be committed to it! The Bible tells us that we must defend our faith.</span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Material</b></span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>The Bible is needed to tell us what we are defending.</b></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> The answer to the question, “What is Christianity?” can only be found in the Bible. The verse referenced above mentions that Christ is Lord and speaks of the hope that is within us. This is one verse which presents at least two components of Christianity. There are many others. If we understand that we must defend our faith but do not know what our faith is in then we are unable to defend our faith. We must know what it is we are defending before we are able to defend it. </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">We not only </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>have</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> to know the Bible, we </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>should</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> know it! The Bible tells us about the faith we defend.</span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Manner</b></span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>The Bible is necessary to tell us how to defend our faith. </b></span></span> </p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">If we believe the Bible then we have a motive for defending our faith and we know what we have faith in, but </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>how</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> should we defend our faith? The verse we have been considering tells us to provide a defense and tells us what we are defending. It also tells us how to defend our faith. We start by regarding Christ the Lord as holy, and we present our arguments with gentleness and respect. This verse contains instruction on how we are to defend our faith. There are many others. There is no reason to regard Christ the Lord as holy or to be gentle and respectful toward those who oppose the faith if we do not recognize that the Bible is morally binding. We cannot even know who Christ is apart from the Bible, much less call Him Lord or regard Him in our hearts as holy. We not only </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>have</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> to submit to the Bible, we</span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i> should</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> submit to it. The Bible tells us the way in which we are to defend our faith.</span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Method</b></span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>The Bible is necessary to tell us the method by which we are to defend our faith.</b></span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">The Bible is necessary for the motive, material, and manner of the defense of the faith. There is another sense to the question, “How should we defend the faith?” This question is not asking for just the </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>manner</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> in which we defend our faith, but the </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>method</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> by which we defend it. Of course motive, material and manner are all parts of method and we have seen that all three come from the Bible. The method by which we defend our faith likewise comes from…you guessed it…the Bible! Remember that 1 Peter 3.15 commands that we are to honor Christ the Lord as holy. There is no realm in which Christ is not Lord; Christ is Lord of all. Those who do not submit to the Lordship of Christ Jesus are rebelling against God. They disagree with God in thought, word, deed, or some mixture of all of the above. However, no one can disagree with God on a point and still have the truth about it. Disagreeing with God is, to put it plainly, stupid. For example, “The fool says in his heart, ‘There is no God’ Psalms 14:1a (ESV)”; </span></span><sup><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>“</b></span></span></sup><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">The fear of the </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">Lord</span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> is the beginning of knowledge; fools despise wisdom and instruction. Proverbs 1:7 (ESV)”; and “For although they knew God, they did not honor him as God or give thanks to him, but they became futile in their thinking, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Claiming to be wise, they became fools Romans 1:21-22 (ESV)”. </span></span> </p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Believing The Bible</b></span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">When someone contradicts the Lord Jesus Christ, who is Truth (John 14.6), on a fundamental point (e.g. the universe is created by God, the Bible is the Word of God) that person is attempting to start off in the wrong direction when it comes to understanding anything correctly. Our method of defending the faith should be the same as what the Bible presents. The Bible makes the claim that it is the Word of God. It is </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>self-attesting</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">. </span></span><sup><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size: 8pt;font-size:78%;" ><b>“</b></span></span></sup><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness, that the man of God may be competent, equipped for every good work. 2 Tim 3:16-17 (ESV)” </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">If God is the final authority on all matters of truth, then what He says goes. Hence the Bible as the Word of God is also </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>self-authenticating</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">. There is no higher standard than the Word of God by which we may judge the Word of God. “</span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">For when God made a promise to Abraham, since He had no one greater by whom to swear, He swore by Himself Hebrews 6:13 (ESV)” </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">If someone does not agree with the Word of God, you can be pretty sure that he or she will not agree with your words concerning the Word of God. The Bible is the Word of God, the Word of God is true, and to reject this results in futile thought. </span></span> </p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>Foolishness Of Unbelief</b></span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">Many think it is foolish to have such faith in the Bible, including Christians. It angers many that someone should take the Bible to be the final authority, as we do, on faith. What alternative do those raising this supposed objection have to offer? They say that they object based upon what their senses and their reason tells them. Perhaps they claim to take “science” as their authority in matters of truth, even when it comes to judging whether or not the Bible is the Word of God. There is a serious problem with this view. How do we know that science is a reliable guide to truth? We cannot test “science” using science. Even if we could test science in this way, we would just be </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>using science</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> to test science, and the question is whether or not science is reliable in the first place! Those wanting to defend the view in question could say that they have </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>faith</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> in science, but this means that their final authority fails at the most basic level. Having “faith in science” is not scientific at all, and so the position falls under its own weight. The foundation is cracked, and even if it were not, it would not be wide enough. There are many things which cannot be touched by science. Logic is not scientifically testable, nor are moral laws, yet the reality of both of these press upon us every day! Furthermore, how do we know that the universe will continue to work in predictable ways? Should we remain open to new possibilities in scientific discovery, even unpredictable ones? If so, why should we continue in science upon the assumption that things will remain the same?</span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">Christians believe the Bible. God has given us our senses and reason to use in coming to truth. Science is something we are able to do because God made and controls the world. Furthermore God has made us in such a way that we are able to come to know the world. While there is much to learn, we will never learn anything that overturns a fact which is known and revealed by our all-knowing and loving God. God has revealed Himself to us through His creation and given us reliable tools to know Him more. This we know because the Bible tells us so. We make observations and think about them and come to conclusions. However, in using our faculties we do not take them to be the final authority. </span></span> </p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">God has given us the Bible. May we reflect on this and allow it to shape our understanding of all we think, say, and do, even when it comes to defending the Bible itself.</span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>About the Author</b></span></span></p> <p style="margin-bottom: 0in;"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><b>C.L. Bolt</b></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> holds a B.A. Philosophy (High Honors) and B.A. Religion from Lynchburg College (Magna Cum Laude) where he was awarded with the 2007 Raymond Morgan Award in Philosophy, 2008 Virgil Hinds Award in Religion, 2008 Access Achievement Award, was inducted into Phi Kappa Phi and was a member of the 2008 VFIC Ethics Bowl Team. He is pursuing his M.Div. with a concentration in Biblical and Theological Studies at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY. He contributes to Choosing Hats apologetics blog at </span></span><span style="color:#0000ff;"><u><a href="http://www.choosinghats.com/"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">www.choosinghats.com</span></span></a></u></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> and wrote a chapter for </span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"><i>The Portable Presuppositionalist</i></span></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;"> by Jamin Hubner available at </span></span><span style="color:#0000ff;"><u><a href="http://www.amazon.com/"><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">www.amazon.com</span></span></a></u></span><span style="font-family:Times New Roman, serif;"><span style="font-size:100%;">. He lives in Indiana with his wife Kerri and dog Flash.</span></span></p>
<br />Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-18622573606522109572009-09-09T11:19:00.000-07:002009-09-11T15:17:28.998-07:00Conversation with a Mormon -- Forgiveness and Repentance<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://www.lds.org/images/logo_english.gif"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer; width: 180px; height: 87px;" src="http://www.lds.org/images/logo_english.gif" alt="" border="0" /></a>Dustin:Hello, how may i help you?<br />Ken: I was wondering if you could explain something to me about Forgiveness<br />Dustin: sure?<br />Dustin:great what would you like to know about it?<br />Ken: A friend of mine, who is a Mormon, was explaining <a href="http://neothoughtsofken.blogspot.com/2008/01/mediator-lds-parable-examined.html">a parable an LDS leader told </a>about forgiveness where you owe God, and Jesus takes your fine<br />Dustin: ok<br />Dustin: Well every body sins and there is no way for use to pay heavenly father back of doing this wrong<br />Ken: ok<br />Dustin: the only way we could pay him back is to sacrifice something that is perfect and without sin<br />Dustin: and jesus christ is the only one who was perfect besides god.<br />Dustin: so jesus volunteered to die for our sins<br />Dustin: so we could return to our father in heaven. but it's not a free ride. we still have to repent.<br />Ken: ok, so when Jesus Died on the Cross, I don't understand how my debt transfered, so that I owe him and not the Fatherhttp://www.blogger.com/post-create.g?blogID=3888890053009864274<br />Dustin: ok well have you ever had to pay some one so you barrowed money from some one else?<br />Dustin: its like paying a cell phone bill with a credit card.<br />Ken: ok<br />Dustin: you have payed it you just barrowed money from some one else.<br />Ken: ok<br />Dustin: jesus is like the credit card he was the only one who could pay heavenly father back.<br />Ken: ok<br />Dustin: so our debt goes to jesus. Did that help at all?<br />Ken: yes<br />Ken: I don't then understand how I am getting out from under my debt<br />Ken: if <a href="http://www.lds.org/ldsorg/v/index.jsp?locale=0&sourceId=e63b2f2324d98010VgnVCM1000004d82620a____&vgnextoid=bbd508f54922d010VgnVCM1000004d82620aRCRD">forgiveness</a> is defined as "It is to pardon or excuse someone from blame for an offense or misdeed"<br />Ken: It doesn't seem like that happens,<span style="font-style: italic;"> I never get excused</span><br />Dustin: <span style="font-style: italic;">well you aren't</span>, how you return the debt to jesus is to repent.<br />Ken: I just get passed off<br />Dustin: like paying the credit bill when it comes.<br />Ken: <span style="font-style: italic;">So it is up to me to pay off Jesus?</span><br />Dustin: well it does when you repent you are getting the excuse or pardon from jesus<br />Ken: If I am doing something, how is it a pardon<br />Dustin: <span style="font-style: italic;">yes yes it is completely up to you</span>. you have to choose to repent to pay off jesus<br />Ken: it seems really hard<br />Dustin: you have to repent. do you know what it means to repent?<br />Ken: To turn around, seek forgiveness, and then <span style="font-style: italic;">Not do it ever again</span>?<br />Dustin: <span style="font-style: italic;">yes it is hard</span>. its how we show were are sorry for the things we done. but its not impossible.<span style="font-style: italic;"> i have repented for things in my life.</span><br />Dustin: yes that is repentence<br />Ken: how do you know you won't do them in the future?<br />Ken: I mean, as a dude, can you tell me that you or I go a day without lust?<br />Dustin: <span style="font-style: italic;">you don't it is completely up to you.</span> if you choose to do them or not. but true repentance you will strive to not do them again<br />Dustin: i know exactly what your talking about.<br />Ken: <span style="font-style: italic;">So is Repentance about actually not doing it again, or just meaning to not do it again?</span><br />Dustin: the point were you have to repent is if you act on that lust.<br />Ken: <span style="font-weight: bold;">so just lusting is ok, but when I act on it, that is when it becomes sin?</span><br />Dustin: <span style="font-style: italic;">Repentance is not doing it again.</span> lust is the temptation.<br />Dustin: <span style="font-weight: bold;">yes</span><br />Ken: ok<br />Dustin: i'm a missionary and i still look at girls and have the same temptation but i do not act on it.<br />------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br />Portions of this chat were changed (spelling corrections and double lines removed), emphasis was added. My Purpose for this is not to trap Mormons, but rather for us to see what they will actually say.<br /><br />I have to say that is was the most telling and troubling conversation I have ever had on <a href="http://www.mormon.org/mormonorg/eng/ask-a-question/chat-live">Chat with a Missionary</a>. The amount of redefinition that occurred was unthinkable, and this is most shocking when it comes to Sin. <br /><br />The other thing that I am a bit confused about, and maybe a Mormon can comment on this, When He (Dustin) said that Jesus is the only person who is perfect besides the Father, he seems to be leaving out the Holy Spirit ( who is described as a personage in LDS theology) and Elhoim's Father (God's Father).Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-60262419618203915322009-09-08T09:31:00.001-07:002009-09-08T12:16:54.503-07:00Obama Preaches Sermon to School Children<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkRd_QphVrNyhTDWfYqcepc9o7hfg3qlOwzs2kB_kjaabsBg8SDhPHrqK3JEZ8BlcwarbB_Sy4YiJCm2csNbls9pCPq0y4CG62gPOMQoeIIaylZh6FHQZjmSwClkYD80-KKkqiiT8ay_0/s1600-h/Obama+Cross.jpg"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 238px; height: 320px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgkRd_QphVrNyhTDWfYqcepc9o7hfg3qlOwzs2kB_kjaabsBg8SDhPHrqK3JEZ8BlcwarbB_Sy4YiJCm2csNbls9pCPq0y4CG62gPOMQoeIIaylZh6FHQZjmSwClkYD80-KKkqiiT8ay_0/s320/Obama+Cross.jpg" border="0" alt=""id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5379139924618981186" /></a><br />Christian Pulpit News Today - <br /><br />In a stunning development President Obama abandoned his planned speech this morning to the nation's school children, and instead preached an evangelical <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/president-obamas-back-school-message-students/Story?id=8509426&page=1">sermon</a>. Many hearing this were shocked and amazed that the President would go against the popular opinion of his political party and speak to the children about Jesus. <br /><br />The Reverend E.R. Tickler of the Feelings Tabernacle, in West Warwick, RI said this after hearing the President's sermon, "I was shocked and extremely pleased that he could be so relevant to the youth culture today. What was even more amazing is that he seems to use the same depot that I get my sermons from." When asked about where He purchased his sermons, Reverend Tickler had no comment, however, He said that he now supports the President more then ever. <br /><br />Other Christian leaders have also stepped up to offer their thanks to the President, Donald Miller, who helped Obama in his bid for the presidency was overcome with emotion while watching the sermon. He commented that he knew Obama wanted to reduce the number of abortions in the nation, feed starving people and get healthcare to those who need it and never knew that he planned on using preaching accomplish these goals. <br /><br />Not everyone is pleased with the presidents sermon. The ACLU has already filed a federal lawsuit to expel the president from schools and any other government run activities. The media contact for the ACLU, Ms. Johnson said this," Today we will begin to wage a war on religion in American Schools. The President has no right to preach a sermon to the American children." When asked if She believed that the ACLU was forwarding the religion of Secular Humanism within the school system, Ms. Johnson has no comment. <br /><br />The highlight of the sermon is something that echos in Christian churches around the United States every Sunday. No doubt Christians are familiar with the gospel that is preached there and by president Obama. "Every single one of you has something you're good at. Every single one of you has something to offer. And you have a responsibility to yourself to discover what that is... Some of the most successful people in the world are the ones who've had the most failures. JK Rowling's first Harry Potter book was rejected twelve times before it was finally published. Michael Jordan was cut from his high school basketball team, and he lost hundreds of games and missed thousands of shots during his career."<br /><br />As the fall out from the preaching of this evangelical sermon continues we are committed at Christian Pulpit News Today to keep you updated and informed.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-65789168357015788882009-09-07T18:22:00.000-07:002009-09-07T19:45:53.568-07:00Modern Worship Music pt. 2In the last post on Thoughts of a Christian on the topic of Worship Music, the song Above All was discussed. The song had some positive points, and some negative ones too. However, today's song, is to date the worst 'worship' song I have ever heard.<br /><br />Title: The More I Seek You<br />Artist: Kari Jobe<br />Written by: Zach Neese<br />Record Label: Integrity Music<br />Theological Review Preformed by: N/A<br /><br /><object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/LZfsxydxEXA&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/LZfsxydxEXA&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object><br /><br />Lyrics:<br /><br />The more i seek you,<br />the more i find you<br />The more i find you, the more I love you<br /><br />Chorus:I wanna sit at your feet<br />drink from the cup in your hand.<br />Lay back against you and breath, here your heart beat<br />This love is so deep, it's more than I can stand.<br />I melt in your peace, it's overwhelming<br />(Repeat from Beginning)<br /><br />Chorus:4x<br /><br />I think that there are several issues that can be addressed in this short song. When I look at a worship song, I am looking for something that can be both prayed in private and sung in a corporate setting. So when looking at this song my first, and possibly the most troublesome issue with this song, is that this song could be sung to any lover one could choose; man, women, God... really whomever you choose. The Object of this song is completely ambiguous, which has no historically grounds as valid within the Church. Secondly, this song is very very sexual in the nature of the lyrics. Given that the song is indeed about Jesus, I can't honestly say that I have any of these quasi sexual feelings about Jesus. I don't want to sit at his feet, or lay back against him and hear his heart beat. Third, speaking of Jesus in these amorous terms is, I believe, disrespectful to his Divinity. This is God we are talking about (to) here. Fourth, There is zero theological content. Any heretic could sing this without a flinch. It isn't edifying to the body. Finally, The last problem with this song is, in the words of Mark Driscoll, that it turns Jesus into my 'Bearded Girlfriend.'<br /><br />I say we go back to quality, none-emotionally based worship music.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com4tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-6885805455010886082009-09-06T00:27:00.000-07:002009-09-06T20:56:04.355-07:00A Powerful Reminder from SpurgeonIf you don't receive <a href="http://www.gracegems.org/">Grace Gems</a>, I highly recommend you do. Here is one that I received not long ago, with a powerful reminder from C. H. Spurgeon:<br /><br /><blockquote>May you so live, that when you stand over your child's dead body, you may never hear a voice coming up from that clay, "Father, your negligence was my destruction! Mother, your prayerlessness was the instrument of my damnation!"<br /><br /> "Impress these words of Mine on your hearts and minds. . . Teach them to your children, talking about them when you sit at home and when you walk along the road, when you lie down and when you get up." Deuteronomy 11:18-19.</blockquote><br /><br />I think that this is a fitting 100th blog post, Praise the Lord.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-49889362261342132952009-09-02T21:26:00.000-07:002009-09-02T21:56:44.239-07:00More of Steven Anderson's AnticsWell, I know... I shouldn't be shocked by the ignorance of the KJVOnlyist 'pastor' Steven Anderson, however, he has fallen to a new low in my book. He has video taped himself burning a copy of the NIV bible. This is truly a sad and stupid act. I have to say that the thing that sickens me the most about this video is Mr. Anderson's Smile.<br /><br /><object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/8ABDM9xneqo&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/8ABDM9xneqo&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object><br /><br />Now Dr. James White, a Critical Consultant, on the NASB has issued a response that is very good.<br /><br /><object width="445" height="364"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/r5T2aqbyxuA&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/r5T2aqbyxuA&hl=en&fs=1&rel=0&color1=0x234900&color2=0x4e9e00&border=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="445" height="364"></embed></object><br /><br />I would ask that those who are KJVO or are KJV preferred really look into the issues here. There are a lot of complexities that need to be understood.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-5214507835375311502009-09-01T16:34:00.001-07:002009-09-01T19:12:35.509-07:00The Luthers and BeerOne of my favorite Luther <a href="http://www.cafepress.com/cafefide.363333956">quotes</a> of all time is:<br /><br /><blockquote>"... while I sat still and drank beer with Philip and Amsdorf, God dealt the papacy a mighty blow."<br /></blockquote>And so keeping that quote in mind, I would ask my Lutheran Brothers, what is the deal with this picture...<br /><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjP0-JEYw_V-L99HTQGbbjh71Uu_VIQ6iEAy_SnThRqGvZ2MxpLmou4UIvdIjbxhCNUHh4gCA_bTUFUzgU3S-x2wKHUndSiiwV0GSILqNL-s41zQWB-IrsujDWleNwxkCxvdr9L4Wt-MBE/s1600-h/IMG00081-20090901-1516.jpg"><img style="margin: 0px auto 10px; display: block; text-align: center; cursor: pointer; width: 473px; height: 630px;" src="https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjP0-JEYw_V-L99HTQGbbjh71Uu_VIQ6iEAy_SnThRqGvZ2MxpLmou4UIvdIjbxhCNUHh4gCA_bTUFUzgU3S-x2wKHUndSiiwV0GSILqNL-s41zQWB-IrsujDWleNwxkCxvdr9L4Wt-MBE/s400/IMG00081-20090901-1516.jpg" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5376650770465270466" border="0" /></a> ( In case you can't tell the little white sign says, " No Alcoholic Beverages Allowed" )<br /><br />I think that this might baffle Chris Rosebrough over at<a href="http://www.fightingforthefaith.com/"> Fighting for the Faith</a>.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-25211456455094621642009-08-29T19:18:00.000-07:002009-08-29T20:00:30.259-07:00More Logicless thinking at 'New Christians'Tony Jones <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/tonyjones/">Blog</a> Seems to be just a breading ground for thinking that is just out of left field. I will give you an example, this is on the same thread as my previous post, regarding the intersexed.<br /><div class="commentPoster"> </div><div class="commentPoster"></div><blockquote><div class="commentPoster">Your Name <span style="font-style: italic;">[ yes, this is the name of the poster] </span></div> To the intersexed individual wanting answers...<br />Just my opinion: I wouldn't seek them here. It sounds like most of the people here haven't walked in your shoes (or don't know that they have since many parents and doctors choose the gender for intersexed babies at birth)...</blockquote>It seems to me that this guy is guilty of a major logic error. Namely, I don't have to walk in the shoes of a murderer or a homosexual or a pro ball player to understand their struggles/nee ds. I mean this amounts to no one person being able to understand any other person, as we haven't all have the same experiences. I mean come on, lets try to think rationally.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-41832758031429638012009-08-25T20:10:00.000-07:002009-08-25T20:32:41.546-07:00Who is the Real FundimentalistI have been busy over at Tony Jones' <a href="http://blog.beliefnet.com/tonyjones/">Blog</a>. They posed a question about being 'intersexed' and I have been responding to one person specifically, Panthera.<br /><br />I am going to post the conversation that has being occurring between He (?) and I, the goal of this is to see who the real fundimentalist is within this conversation.<br /><br /> <div class="commentPoster"> panthera:<br /><p>dustin germain my marriage is legitimate. What you and your hateful version of Christianity thinks is totally irrelevant.</p> <p>For what it's worth, my opinion is very simply put:</p> <p>You should love the person who loves you. Build a committed, monogamous, loving, faithful and true marriage. Who cares what your chromosomal status or your sexuality is, marriage is strictly between two people and not determined by hateful conservative Christians.</p> <p>Regardless of how often they rape, torture, beat and kill us.</p>Me:<br /><br /><p>Panthera~</p> <p>I don't know what your story is, or frankly anything about who you are, and I'm not trying put on a pretense of judgment towards you, however, I think that for the Christian, the word of God must be our Authority for Truth. There are so many experiences, philosophies, sects, cults, and religious persons that I believe that to submit to any of them outside of scripture is folly.In Short, We must have an Arbiter of truth that is external from us.</p> <p>That said I am a conservative Christian. I have never Raped, Tortured, Beat or Killed anyone and being as I don't even know who you are I clearly don't hate you. That said, I am, because of my belief in Sola Scriptura, against any and all forms of marriage that are not given to be valid covenantally by the Word of God (see Gen. 1-2, Matthew 19). I am forced by my love for scripture and the God of Scripture to say that out side of God instituting a covenant, persons in committed, monogamous,loving, lifelong relationships are still fornicating, an act described as sin by both the New and Old Testaments. </p> <p>Is it possible for you to see that perhaps persons who take the view that I have just outlined are not hate-mongers, but rather are people who lovingly desire for you to not come under condemnation from God Almighty?<br /></p><p>panthera:</p><p>Of course it is possible for me, Ken.</p> <p>I find it sad that you needs must imprison God by limiting Him to your interpretation of the Bible. And that is what you do.</p> <p>Calling my marriage fornication is absurd. Do you really think I would abandon my husband just to satisfy your mumbo-jumbo?</p> <p>Not going to happen.</p> <p>There is little charity amongst you fundamentalist Christians, little indeed if you can call a faithful partnership of 25 years a sin.</p> <p>Oh, and, yes, I am a Christian. You can be a Christian and gay. Even a Christian and gay and married.</p><p>Me:</p><p>panthera - </p> <p>I would like to systematically address your response.</p> <p>1. I think that it is completely irrational and unreasonable to say that I am imprisoning God. If the text explains God, then holding to that isn't an imprisonment, but rather a representation. This type of language serves more to Poison the Well, rather then to make a rational argument. </p> <p>2. I am not calling your marriage fornication, I am saying that I do not believe that you can support from scripture same-sex marriage, being covenantally begun by God. I would also note that Dee Bradshaw a pastor in the MCC in his debate with Dr. James White said that he could not do so. </p> <p>3. Do I really think you would abandon your husband just to satisfy my "mumbo-jumbo?" No, I don't. I don't think in fact if Jesus came down and told you that he did not approve of your actions that you would abandon your 'husband.' I hope that you understand that I mean that in the kindest was possible. </p> <p>4. To say that there is little charity amongst fundamentalists may or may not be true, however, I am not a fundamentalist, which is frankly a derogatory term, that has no place in civil discussion. Notice that no where in what I have said did I Directly say that what you are doing is a sin. That is your conclusion from the logical case I am forwarding, but I did not use the word Sin. </p> 5. I think that we must submit to 1 John as to what a Christian, I don't Judge you.<br /><br />panthera:<br /><br /><p>Ken, you wrote, I answered. I won't get into the hysterical fundamentalist/conservative/literalistic/bible-as-God's-only-message discussion with you.</p> <p>Calling a fundamentalist a fundamentalist is no more an insult than it was after church Sunday when a local farmer came up to me and said his b i t c h was in heat and did I think my dawg might spend the week with his family, 'cause he knows what to do with his nose.</p> <p>That man would die for his pretty little dog, they're that close. But he still calls her by what she is.</p> <p>Tony, I see little hope of any mercy from these people for anyone whom they consider 'other'.</p><p>Me:<br /></p><p>Panthera ~</p> <p>The clear issue is that I am not a Fundamentalist. As a matter of fact based on the definition of the term, by Richard Dowkins, You are more of a fundamentalist then I am. "Richard Dawkins has used the term to characterize religious advocates as clinging to a stubborn, entrenched position that defies reasoned argument or contradictory evidence." </p> <p>The clear fact is that you, in our brief encounter, have done exactly this. Thus we must conclude that You are the Fundamentalist not I. </p>panthera:<br /><br /><p>Ken,<br />And Richard Dawkin's opinion is relevant because...?</p> <p>I simply don't care how you self-identify. I have no interest in the mumbo-jumbo you practice in your version of Christianity in your church.</p> <p>All I care about is that you cease attacking my status as a human and stop blocking my civil rights, including the right to have my marriage legally recognized in the US.</p> <p>That is the difference between us - I am more than happy to leave you and your hatefilled ilk be. You recognize neither my status as Christian nor human, demanding I bend to your perverted, hatefilled will.</p> <p>Ain't gonna happen.</p> I will die before I surrender to you and your nasty fellow travelers.<br /><br />Me:<br /><p>Panthera ~</p> <p>Can you please show me, and everyone else reading this where exactly I have said you are "not-Human" in any interaction here.</p> <p>I find it funny that you refuse to do anything but cry victim, as if I have dehumanized you, degraded you, or treated you at all poorly. When in fact I have done none of these things. I understand that you have no doubt been mistreated previously, which I openly condemn. I am simply trying to have a rational discussion with you about in issue.</p><p>----------------------------------------------------------------------------------</p><p>I find it amazing that 1. I am not a nasty, hate-monger, anti-gay, dehumanizing, fundamentalist. However, looking at the more modern definition given by Richard Dawkins, I am asking:<br /></p><p>Who is the Real Fundamentalist??</p><p>You be the Judge.<br /></p><p><br /></p><p><br /></p> </div>Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3888890053009864274.post-67550823365037006172009-08-23T21:03:00.000-07:002009-09-05T16:41:24.485-07:00Terms Defined - LDS TestimonyIn Mormonism, the term Testimony is defined in "True to the Faith" (2004 Edition) as:<br /><br />A Testimony is a spiritual witness given by the Holy Ghost. The Foundation of a testimony is the knowledge that Heavenly Father live and loves us: that Jesus Christ live, and that He is the Son of God, and that he carried out the infinite Atonement; that Joseph Smith is the prophet of God who was called to restore the gospel; that we are led by a living prophet today; and that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is the Savior's true Church on the earth. With this foundation, a testimony grows to include all principles of the gospel.Ken Cookhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18228085189578058819noreply@blogger.com0